.png){kind=small}
_edited.jpeg)
_edited.png)
EFRS 2022
Impact Analysis
POST-SYMPOSIUM SURVEY
Gelecekteki etkinliklerimizi daha etkin ve sürdürülebilir bir şekilde yürütmek için 26-27 Mayıs 2022 tarihlerinde gerçekleşen EFRS 2022 SONUNDA değerlendirmelerinizi bizimle paylaşmanızı rica ediyoruz.
Anket yaklaşık 3,5 dakika sürecektir.
Katkılarınız için teşekkür ederiz.
METEM
To carry out our future events more effectively and sustainably, we kindly ask you to share your evaluations with us at the END of EFRS 2022, which took place on 26-27 May 2022.
The survey will take approximately 3.5 minutes.
We appreciate your contributions,
METEM
INFORMED CONSENT & PARTIPATION APPROVAL FORM
In this study, we undertake to comply with the Personal Data Protection Law No. 6698. The data obtained from the survey will be kept confidential, will not be used individually, and will be gathered in a data pool.
The answers you give here reflect your thoughts. We accept that these do not reflect the views of the companies you are affiliated with and/or are not binding on the companies.
Your participation in the survey is voluntary.
PARTICIPANT ROLES AND EXPECTATIONS
1. Which of the following best describes you? (You can choose multiple answers)
2. How much has EFRS 2022 contributed to you in terms of the following issues?
Please rate each statement below on a scale of 1 to 6. "1" will mean that you have not benefited in the question asked. "6" will show that you have a high level of benefit in the question asked.
If the subject in the question is not related to your job or the way you participate in the symposium, mark the "No Answer" option.
I had the opportunity to strengthen my existing social connections.
Unanswered (The topic is unrelated to my business/ EFRS'22 participation.)
1- I had no benefit in this regard.
6-I benefited a lot in this regard.
I established new social connections.
I was able to make my company and brands known.
I was able to introduce my new product portfolio
I was able to develop my personal technical knowledge.
I was able to follow the developments related to the sector.
I learned best practices.
I had the opportunity to expand my customer network.
I was able to create links for the sale.
I was able to exchange knowledge and experience with the participants.
I was able to learn solutions to industry-specific and technical problems.
I benefited from the experience and knowledge of the doyens who steer the sector.
I got to know the businesses working in the sector.
I have been informed about new products, services, and technologies.
I had a enjoyable time and had the opportunity to socialize.
3. Which of the topics in the content of the symposium attracted your attention the most? (You can choose more than one.)
4. Please rate how satisfied you are with EFRS 2022 from the following aspects.
Please mark the appropriate score reflecting your level of satisfaction between "1- Not satisfied at all" and "6-Very satisfied".
Symposium location
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Presentation halls
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Lunch
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Treats
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Gala dinner
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Registration process
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
General hygiene conditions
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Approaches of the people who manage the organization
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Technical support
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Approaches of event attendants who provide in-room support
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
Symposium bag
1- Not satisfied at all
6. Very satisfied.
5. Please rate EFRS 2022 on scale from the day you enroll to completion.
Please mark the appropriate score reflecting your level of satisfaction between "1- Not satisfied at all" and "6-Very satisfied".
What is your level of satisfaction when you evaluate the EFRS 2022 symposium in general?
1. Not satisfied at all.
6. Very satisfied.
6. Please evaluate the sessions and meetings you attended in EFRS 2022 in terms of the following issues in general.
If you do not have an observation to make the relevant evaluation, you can mark the last option.
The richness of the acquisitions (program, information, content, etc.)
0 - I have no observation to make this evaluation.
1. Not effective at all / unsuccessful
6- Very effective / successful
Scientific and technical depth of presentations
Level that the presentations reflect sectoral developments
Presenting in an interesting and interactive way
The quality of the discussion and question-answer sessions
Benefits created for the development of the audience
Speakers and speech content in remote/online presentations
Technology use in remote/online sessions
7. If you had to choose between the two, which form of oral presentation would you prefer?
8. What topics would you like to learn at the next EFRS symposium?
9. Who would you like to hear at the next EFRS symposium?
10. What would you suggest to us to make EFRS better?
11. Which activities and topics would you like METEM to do in the future?
12. Which of the following constructs do you think METEM should prioritize in its future events?
Events with physical attendance
1- NOT be given priority.
SHOULD BE given priority
Online/digital/remote events
1- NOT be given priority.
SHOULD BE given priority
Events with hybrid participation
1- NOT be given priority.
SHOULD BE given priority
Small-scale/tailor-made events on special subject matters
1- NOT be given priority.
SHOULD BE given priority
Events with wide participation, carried out in large fairgrounds
1- NOT be given priority.
SHOULD BE given priority
13. In what format would you like papers and posters to be presented in events such as symposiums and congresses to be organized in the future? Please mark an option that you prefer the most.
14. What would you recommend that sponsors and stand owner companies give as promotional material to be distributed to delegates and audiences at symposiums and conferences?
15. Would you recommend the EFRS’ location change to different cities every year? If you suggest, can you specify the city?
16. Would you recommend holding the EFRS in another Izmir-based venue? If you have an alternative location suggestion, please specify.
17. Gender?
18. Age?
19. Education status?
20. Your Occupation
21. Your job title?
22. Do you have a managerial role?
23. Indicate your area of responsibility. (You can choose more than one.)
24. Which of the following options best describes you?
Successfully sent.
Something went wrong. Check the missing information and try again.
In this study, Effect Tracking Software of the Psychosocial Risk Management Institute was used.
